Wednesday 25th April 2018 0837 – @ES_Humour via Twitter | Visit our website | Contact Us
Police Went to a Funeral Home to Unlock a Dead Man’s Phone With His Finger (US)
Police in Florida (US) went to a funeral home and managed to use the finger of its deceased owner in order to try and unlock his mobile phone as part of their investigation.
30-year old Linus Phillip was killed by a Police Officer based in Largo last month, after it was reported that he tried to speed away from Police before an Officer was able to search him.
Two Detectives later attended the funeral home where Phillips body was being kept and pressed the dead man’s finger against the fingerprint reader on the device in order to try and get access to the phone.
It is reported that this method did not work, and that the detectives could not access the device.
When the local press spoke to Phillips fiance, Victoria Armstrong, she expressed that she felt ‘violated’ and ‘disrespected’ by the act – believed to be the first of its kind that has been widely reported on.
It is not entirely clear what happened immediately prior to Phillips being stopped by the Police, or whether they had any prior intelligence on his activities which might give some idea as to why he refused to stop/be searched.
Legal experts based in the States have agreed that what the Detectives did, in relation to trying to unlock Phillips iPhone, was legal but they have queried as to whether or not the actions were appropriate.
Charles Rose, a professor at Stetson University College of Law, told the Tampa Bay Times that: ‘dead people cannot assert their Fourth Amendment Protections because you can’t own property when you are dead. But those rights could apply to whoever inherits the property.
It would seem that accessing a deceased persons phone is a bit of a grey area in general (apart from where such access is needed for matters of urgent National Security etc).
On Apple’s website it states:
‘Device Requests make up the majority of requests that Apple receives. Most commonly they come from law enforcement agencies working on behalf of customers who have requested assistance locating lost or stolen devices.
We report these as Device Requests. Additionally, Apple regularly receives multi-device requests related to fraud investigations. Device Requests generally seek information about a customer’s iPhone, iPad or Mac.’
Although we couldn’t find any specific information on Apple’s website in relation to law enforcement agencies accessing iPhones once it owner has passed away.
There is, however, plenty of reports on the internet in relation to work that has been carried out by Apple in order to make it harder and harder for law enforcement agencies to get access to its devices.
Clearly, this subject is a contentious one, but where urgent matters relating to National Security are at stake, I would find it hard to believe that our top scientists would not be able to gain access to any device – regardless of the firewalls which are placed on handsets by their manufacturers.
And rightly so.
When the lives of innocent people are at stake, then surely we hope and expect that the job of the security services would not be hampered by their inability to access some hardware which has some vital information or intelligence on it?
There will be many people who feel that devices such as mobile phones should not be able to be accessed by the security services under any circumstances.
And, of course, they are entitled to their own opinion.
But I would ask such a person if they have ever been the victim of a crime, or have they ever been caught up in a terrorist attack?
If they answered ‘yes’ I would then asked them how would they feel if the crime could have been prevented by the security services had they (the security services) been able to access the mobile phone of the perpetrator?
Whilst you are here, we have a quick favour to ask! – We do not have a paywall for our articles or indeed any of our content on YouTube or Facebook. We work tirelessly and extremely hard in order to try and bring you content that we (hope) will keep you entertained and informed!
But if you can, then please subscribe to our fortnightly ‘subscriber only’ eMagazine, S__ts & Giggles, which contains all of the funniest blogs, pictures, stories and special features which we do not share online!
It ONLY costs £1 / $1 per month to subscribe – it’s your subscription that enables us to keep producing our content and it’s your subscription that enables us to carry on being the (un)official voice of the emergency services! Support our work —>
Got a story or video? You can contact our team of international Admins (anonymously) Contact our team —>
Before you go...
We need your help. As former emergency services & armed forces personnel, we pride ourselves on bringing you important, fast-moving and breaking news stories which are free from the negative bias which is often directed at the emergency services by some sections of the mainstream media.
One of the reasons we started 'Emergency Services News' was because we became tired of reading badly informed stories about the emergency services which seemed only ever to highlight negative aspects of the job.
We want to be the unheard voice of the remarkable men and women who serve in the emergency services, NHS and armed forces. And with around 500k page views each month, we are getting there!
As income from ads, the mainstay source of income for most publishers, continues to decline; we need the help of our readers.
And remember, if you have a service, product or job vacancy that you would like to promote to our large readership, then you can buy advertising space in our articles.
You can support emergency services news from as little as £1. It only takes a minute. Every contribution, however big or small, is vital for our future.
Please help us to continue to highlight the life-saving work of the emergency services, NHS and armed forces by becoming a supporter.