The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) investigation into allegations that individuals within the Metropolitan Police Service’s (MPS) Directorate of Professional Standards (DPS) abused their position to affect ongoing investigations has found no to case to answer.
The Directorate of Professional Standards is the internal MPS body responsible for investigating complaints against the conduct of its officers.
Talking about the outcome of the investigation, IOPC Director of Major Investigations Steve Noonan said:
“This has been a very detailed and complex investigation which found the allegations were either not corroborated or were disproved by the evidence.
“We initially received a total of 38 allegations relating to 15 officers and one member of police staff.
“Following an extensive scoping exercise and review of the evidence, our investigation focused on 21 allegations involving eight officers and one member of police staff.
“Our investigation examined if there were systemic issues within processes, culture, leadership and internal communication within the DPS.
“We looked at why the allegations had been made, the context at the relevant time and the systemic issues that may be involved.
“We did establish that the Directorate’s working practices at the time leant themselves to the possibility of perceptions of prejudice through a lack of communication between officers and a lack of understanding of and adherence to misconduct regulations.
“Internal process changes in who should act as the Appropriate Authority for certain types of cases were not communicated well and brought about confusion to the wider team of officers.
“Since our investigation the DPS has changed its internal processes and now allocates an officer from a dedicated unit rather than from within the team to conduct an investigation and is also working to improve communication between officers.”
The allegations related to more than 25 internal investigations and included:
- interference in investigations to downgrade the severity of charges laid against an officer
- interference to assist an officer accused of wrong-doing ignoring, a potential conflict of interest, failing to properly engage with evidence presented and abuses of process while conducting an investigation into an allegation of racist behaviour being dropped to protect the reputation of MPS.
The matter was referred to the IOPC in November 2017, and their investigation concluded in July 2020.
The IOPC has not released details concerning the origin of the referrals which were made to them.
Talking about the outcome of the investigation, the IOPC said that they had identified opportunities for ‘some individual learning’.
They also added that they are ‘working with the MPS on learning within DPS’.
Statement From The Met
Commander Paul Betts, Lead Officer of Professionalism within the MPS, said:
“We are pleased following a complex and lengthy IOPC investigation that no evidence of misconduct was identified for these experienced members of the DPS team.
“It is, of course, important these allegations were thoroughly investigated, but the impact on those directly affected should not be underestimated.
“We have improved communication within the DPS by making changes to our structure.
“This includes how we appoint an ‘appropriate authority’, a more senior officer who makes decisions on misconduct investigations, and the creation of a dedicated team to liaise directly with the IOPC.
“We have also improved our record keeping and trained officers and staff around the importance of this and how to use new IT systems now in place.
“These measures allow us to be far clearer on correct processes to follow, clarify roles and responsibilities and avoid any confusion and misunderstanding by colleagues.
“Our aim is to encourage a culture of openness, transparency and accountability in all our decision making.”
Before you go...
We need your help. As former emergency services & armed forces personnel, we pride ourselves on bringing you important, fast-moving and breaking news stories which are free from the negative bias which is often directed at the emergency services by some sections of the mainstream media.
One of the reasons we started 'Emergency Services News' was because we became tired of reading badly informed stories about the emergency services which seemed only ever to highlight negative aspects of the job.
We want to be the unheard voice of the remarkable men and women who serve in the emergency services, NHS and armed forces. And with around 500k page views each month, we are getting there!
As income from ads, the mainstay source of income for most publishers, continues to decline; we need the help of our readers.
And remember, if you have a service, product or job vacancy that you would like to promote to our large readership, then you can buy advertising space in our articles.
You can support emergency services news from as little as £1. It only takes a minute. Every contribution, however big or small, is vital for our future.
Please help us to continue to highlight the life-saving work of the emergency services, NHS and armed forces by becoming a supporter.