A former gang member has spoken about his experiences of stop and search.
Many sections of the mainstream media – and some politicians – constantly seek to undermine stop and search without having any fundamental or accurate understanding of how stop and search can, in real terms, save peoples lives.
But a former gang member, who was recently released from prison, has taken the bold step of talking openly about his previous life and how he now understands the critical role that stop and search has to play in reducing knife crime.
Under the Twitter handle @smcgrath90, ‘Sicarius McGrath’ said:
‘I was a career criminal for over two decades. My crimes ranged from ASB and minor thefts from the age of 15, to firearms and gangs from the age of 21. I was constantly at Loggerheads with Merseyside Police & would be subject to daily stop & search.
‘Since 2017 I gradually implemented change. That change has developed & been reinforced, especially since my release from custody in July 2020 In retrospect, I believe Merseyside Police are a good police force & my negative experience with them was a result of my criminal mindset.
‘My involvement in crime led to my anti-authority views & destructive thinking patterns, something which I now acknowledge & take responsibility [for]. Merseyside Police had a duty to protect the public & that is what they were doing when they would disrupt me on a daily basis.
‘One may assume it to be harassment being stopped & searched 3, 4 or 5 times a day. But the reality is that I presented a monumental risk to the public. I now accept that the large volume of stop & search was proportionate & justified, given the risk which I posed to the society.
‘Since being released from prison, I have further developed my pro social thinking. This has included viewing the police objectively and without the biased perception which I previously held. I am often criticised by others for defending the actions of police.
‘I’ve had numerous messages, primarily from females who suggest I am a grass & that I love the police. This is untrue and is a distorted view which has been exaggerated. A grass is a criminal who relays information to the police. I’m no longer a criminal so don’t fit that criteria.
‘I am now a normal member of society. I’m no longer criminally affiliated, nor do I have any desire to engage with those who are. But just to be clear, I will report incidents to the police & will attend court if necessary. I have no shame in openly admitting that to anyone.
‘That is what normal people do, they call the police and, as I am no longer a criminal, I conform with these normal societal behaviours & expectations. So I hope this has cleared things up for those who make unfounded assumptions about me.
‘To all the ex offenders who portray themselves as legitimate & law abiding; You are in no position to use the word Grass. Grass is terminology used by criminals to brand other criminals who betray the trust of their criminal peers. Grass is not a term used by normal society.
‘If you still harbour this anti authority mindset by branding other people as a grass, then I assure you that you have not yet changed or reformed, and you have a long way to go in order to rehabilitate. Your either on one side of the fence or the other, you cannot be on both.
‘You cannot go to work Monday to Friday, then be a gangster of a Saturday’ I’m afraid it doesn’t work like that. Being confused is not a good quality to have, so maybe reevaluate your life and ask yourself what you want to be, a gangster or a normal member of society? You Decide!’
Click HERE to follow @smcgrath90 on Twitter.
If you have the Google News app on your phone, don’t forget to follow ‘Emergency Services News’.
Got a story? Send your videos and pictures to contact@emergency-services.news You can also find us on Twitter @ES_News_
Before you go...
We need your help. As former emergency services & armed forces personnel, we pride ourselves on bringing you important, fast-moving and breaking news stories which are free from the negative bias which is often directed at the emergency services by some sections of the mainstream media.
One of the reasons we started 'Emergency Services News' was because we became tired of reading badly informed stories about the emergency services which seemed only ever to highlight negative aspects of the job.
We want to be the unheard voice of the remarkable men and women who serve in the emergency services, NHS and armed forces. And with around 500k page views each month, we are getting there!
As income from ads, the mainstay source of income for most publishers, continues to decline; we need the help of our readers.
And remember, if you have a service, product or job vacancy that you would like to promote to our large readership, then you can buy advertising space in our articles.
You can support emergency services news from as little as £1. It only takes a minute. Every contribution, however big or small, is vital for our future.
Please help us to continue to highlight the life-saving work of the emergency services, NHS and armed forces by becoming a supporter.
Fair play, and good on you.
I was a bit of rouge when I was younger, and I wouldn’t say anything like a gang member, and definitely no firearms…. Only gun I’ve ever fired was during army cadets as a kid.
I mixed with some who were extremely criminally minded. We clashed several times, over views of the police.
I said that while I wouldn’t report most minor things, I’d definitely report granny/wife bashing, or pedophiles, etc. When the vulnerable were hurt.
I’m.glad you’ve turned your life around and I wish you well.
I’m also pro, stop n search, it’s an amazing tool that police have, but too many DOO GOODERS, and of course those involved in crime, don’t want it.
If your not involved in crime, what reason do you have to worry about stop n search? None.
If stop n search is slowed or stopped our streets will become far worse than they are now.
We do not know so much about this individual, starting with his age, so we can get an idea of how prolific an offender he really was. More to the point, we do not know what brought about this very welcome change of heart, but it seems that a spell in prison played a contributory role.
Had he been locked up sooner and for longer, this re-evaluation of his future would have happend a lot quicker. Nobody thinks that they are going to be caught and everybody is pretty sure that even if they are caught, not much will happen. What is needed is legislation for minimum sentences that insist that the previous sentence is automatically doubled on each subsequent conviction.
At this point, there are serious consequences. Sooner or later, you will get caught, which should be alarming. Of course, you are innocent until proven guilty, quite rightly so. If you are found guilty, you will go inside. Jail should be mandatory for carrying a blade, any sort of thieving and most drug offences, including taking illegal substances.
Now you are known and you will get caught again, albeit after a spell of porridge. This time, you will go away for twice as long. And so it will repeat. Put another way, for three separate convictions, the minimum aggregated sentence would be 7 years inside. Do it again, you can add another 8, making a total of 15 years. On your fifth conviction, you will get a further 16 years, making a total of 31.
If criminals KNOW this is the best that can happen, they will swiftly re-appraise their career choice. Of course, a judge or magistrate can give longer sentences. So you might get 18 months for your first offence. This would mean that the minimum sentence next time around would be 3 years, and if the judge gives you more, the next time it would be double that. The numbers rack up very, very quickly.
If such a vigorous policy were adopted, crime would drop like a rock. Meanwhile, those here illegally, howsoever they got here, would be interned pending permanent deportation. That would clear out another load of criminals.